• Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m not from USA, black, nor a native English speaker, but due to Linguistics I can give you guys some further info.

    AAE (Afro-American English), in a nutshell, is a group of English varieties used by some speakers from USA and Canada. In a lot of aspects they resemble geographical varieties, like the ones you’d see in plenty other languages, but there’s a key difference: it isn’t used by people “of a certain region”, but rather by people “of a certain race” (black people).

    This is mostly but not completely spoken (cue to the term AAVE - the “V” stands for “vernacular”); it affects also the way that those people use the written language. So often you see AAE features in written English, like:

    • Negative concord - for example, “I don’t want to hear nothing about this shit, man.”
    • Habitual-be - for example, “They be talking about this everyday.”
    • bits of non-standard spelling, due to phonetic differences
    • expressions and vocab typically used primarily by black people

    What the article is saying is that LLMs are biased against those features. It’s a rather strong bias, and not noticed for a geographical variety used as reference (Appalachian English). In other words: the LLM has been fed racist babble, and now it’s regurgitating it.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Since they’re vernacular you’ll mostly hear them being spoken, they aren’t really written

      AAVE is commonly “written” now because most writing is texts and social media comments. So even if they luck out and learn “proper” English, people still going to type on their phones the same way they talk.

      Even for white kids, most of Gen Z slang is just taken from AAVE, when older people complaining about not being able to read zoomer slang from text or comments, it’s just heavily influenced by AAVE.

      There’s been bleed over for centuries, but with the Internet and social media it’s merging faster, which is common for dialects of people that interact frequently

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Warning: I’ve edited the comment that you’re replying to. I’m saying this for the sake of transparency, as you’re clearly quoting the earlier version.

        The key here is that AAVE is not written, but AAE is. That “V” is for vernacular, it excludes written English by definition.

        Now, I’m not sure if those white kids are using AAE or simply borrowing things from AAE into their written English. I simply don’t have data on that.

        There’s been bleed over for centuries, but with the Internet and social media it’s merging faster, which is common for dialects of people that interact frequently

        Varieties merging or splitting is rarely the result of just more contact between people; it’s all about identity. If things are happening as you described them, it’s simply that those white kids stopped seeing black people as “the others”, to see them as “part of the same group as us”.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That “V” is for vernacular, it excludes written English by definition.

          Yeah. But most people “write” online like they speak…

          https://commonwealthtimes.org/2021/02/18/aave-is-not-your-internet-slang-it-is-black-culture/

          If people followed rules about language, yeah, vernacular would just be spoken speech. But that’s not how it works. The rules are made to reflect what people are doing. The rules don’t control what people do.

          So yes, while the word vernacular commonly meant only spoken words, there ain’t nothing stopping nobody from typing like they speak.

          And people been doing it for a long time

          • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah. But most people “write” online like they speak…

            That’s a common misconception.

            While your written and spoken varieties do interact a fair bit, no, people don’t “write like they speak”. Not even online.

            And that is not simply an “ackshyually”. A lot of AAVE features simply don’t transpose into writing - like prosody, non-rhoticity, /ɪ/-breaking, /äɪ/-monophtongisation… at most you can consciously approximate them into writing, but they won’t be there.

            If people followed rules about language, yeah, vernacular would just be spoken speech. But that’s not how it works. The rules are made to reflect what people are doing.

            That is not about people following/not following “rules”, it’s about nomenclature - it’s exactly the reason why “AAE” and “AAVE” are necessary as separated terms.

            • treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              More and more people are using speech to text. And it does show how differently people speak than write (apparently I never say my be in because, for example).

              But it also means that llms aren’t only being fed text, but also speech converted into text.