Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 22 hours agoThe value of xsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up198arrow-down14
arrow-up194arrow-down1imageThe value of xsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 22 hours agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squareSiethron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 minutes ago135, that’s not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.
minus-squareLifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 minutes agoNah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle. So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40]) So you then know it’s 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one. 180-45=. 135 degrees
I think 125
135, that’s not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.
Nah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle.
So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40])
So you then know it’s 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one.
180-45=. 135 degrees