Someone on Lemmy posted a phrase recently: “If you’re not prepared to manage backups then you’re not prepared to self host.”

This seems like not only sound advice but a crucial attitude. My backup plans have been fairly sporadic as I’ve been entering into the world of self hosting. I’m now at a point where I have enough useful software and content that losing my hard drive would be a serious bummer. All of my most valuable content is backed up in one way or another, but it’s time for me to get serious.

I’m currently running an Ubuntu Server with a number of Docker containers, and lots of audio, video, and documents. I’d like to be able to back up everything to a reliable cloud service. I currently have a subscription to proton drive, which is a nice padding to have, but which I knew from the start would not be really adequate. Especially since there is no native Linux proton drive capability.

I’ve read good things about iDrive, S3, and Backblaze. Which one do you use? Would you recommend it? What makes your short list? what is the best value?

  • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    I use the unlimited consumer backblaze with private key on a windows VM. I provision a 40tb iscsi connection to the VM from a NAS and all kinds of various homelab systems and devices store thier backups there. Works great and is the cheapest possible option at $9 a month.

    • Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Is that not against their TOS? Could make the service more expensive for the rest of us

      • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m not sure about the iscsi protocol. They allow VMs, including harddrives via USB, so the point of doing this making it more expensive does not apply considering someone could just hook up 100tb+ of USB drives and still be clear under the TOS.

        If they did have a problem with this I would just do that instead.

          • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Well yes and no. The rate at which you get your data back is where the gotcha lies anything up to 8TB is free if you send them $280 and they’ll refund the money once they get the drive back. Anything over 8TB is where it gets pricey.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              And do that multiple times?

              There aren’t any “gotchas” they absolutely lose money us who store more than a few TB but its worth it considering that we are in the minority.

              Someone from BB posted a graph showing the distribution of data usage over all users and the VAST majority are under 1-2 TB

            • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              And the situation where I need to restore more then 8tb would be when I lost all my original data, and the backup NAS itself.

              If that happens I’m not worrying about spending $280.

  • Shimitar@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    First copy on offline USB disk on my server itself. Disk is turned on, backup done, disk goes off. Once a day.

    Second copy on a USB drive connected to an OpenWRT router of my home, the furthest away from the server (in case of fire, I could be able to grab either of the two).

    Third copy offsite on a VPS.

    I use restic & backrest with great satisfaction.

  • rhys@mastodon.rhys.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    @gedaliyah If you’re not married to managed cloud services, services like rsync.net or a Hetzner storage box work very well. They require more effort, but you have complete control and can do some fun things (like using rclone’s crypt module with them). Plus rsync.net is super useful if your sources use ZFS.

    Of the cloud providers, Backblaze is the one that anecdotally seems most popular.

  • eyes_uncl0uded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I started this past year with iDrive because of their incredible welcome deal if you switch from another service. I started a trial with Dropbox with the same email and sent them the requested screenshots for verification- they approved it. Spending $10 for the first year of 5TB

    It’s pretty slow on uploading, but it works. Customer service is attentive and caring. Probably going to go to a local NAS and a different online solution within the year. It’s a nice cheap padding as I learn how to do this right. The intro deal might be worth it for you, too, though I don’t think it’s the best long-term option

  • rutrum@lm.paradisus.day
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I use borgbackup to create backups. I point backups to another home computer and borgbase.com. Borg itself is an amazing tool. I think you should learn how it works even if it doesnt end up being the best fit for you.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Backblaze 200% of the time.

    The only thing that sucks about backblaze is that they’re not designed for enterprise. No account balances. No multi users.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well, no, but I use it for free.

        Because backblaze doesn’t let you maintain an account balance, I almost had all my data get deleted one time my credit card false-positive blocked the payment (for “my protection”).

        I ended up getting a credit card specifically for B2. I use it for nothing else.

        Turns out some credit card companies dont charge you anything if your bill for the month is <$1. So, yeah, I accidentally get backblaze for free.

      • peregus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        When I’ve signed up was the cheaper. I’ve just checked and it’s $6.99/TB/month and Backblaze B2 is actually cheaper ($6/TB/month). Are there other differences that you know of? There must be since everyone is using Baclblaze.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I prefer my local storage. Can’t vouch for any cloud storage.
          Upside of Wasabi to my infrastructure: It’s compatible with Veeam.

  • DarkAngelofMusic@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve been using rsync.net for a while now. It’s been stable, fast, and relatively inexpensive. There’s also the benefit that it’s easy to script automated backups directly to it. For more Dropbox-like functionality, I have a Nextcloud instance that uses rsync.net as external storage. It’s been great so far!

    • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I like that I can interface with it in ways that I already understand (eg rclone, sync, sshfs).

      Being able to run some commands on the server meant that I could use rclone to copy my AWS and OneDrive backups directly cloud-to-cloud.

      • DarkAngelofMusic@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Is it? I’m genuinely asking. I haven’t seen statistics on how much storage people looking for cloud backup solutions use, but to me, anything under 1TB seems too small to be worth it, these days.

  • calamityjanitor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve been using pcloud. They do one time upfront payments for ‘lifetime’ cloud storage. Catch a sale and it’s ~$160/TB. For something long term like backups it seems unbeatable. To the point I sort of don’t expect them to actually last forever, but if they last 2-3 years it’s a decent deal still.

    Use rclone to upload my files, honestly not ideal though since it’s meant for file synchronisation not backups. Also they are dog slow. Downloading my 4TBs takes ~10 days.

  • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    For devices like laptops and PCs. I use Urbackup to make backups.

    For all the apps I host on Kubernetes I setup S3 backups to self hosted Minio.

  • bartvbl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m a long time user of jottacloud. It’s not really meant for 10TB+, but works great for what I need it to do.

  • dawa@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m on Pcloud, server with rsync+rclone to move files from file system to cloud and use it as a unified file system.

    The lifetime storage offer from pcloud has been worth it for me and I even upgraded it from 2 to 12 TB