• kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I FUCKIN LOVE THIS MAN, THOUGH I’VE NEVER MET HIM.

    WE LIVE IN A FUCKING SOCIETY!

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gonna be real honest here, I would have taken that in a heartbeat. It’s an open source project, I could disappear with my money and the project could be continued from a different fork without ads. The only thing you’re really sacrificing is your reputation and with enough money I don’t care.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      and with enough money I don’t care.

      Most people are like you.

      Which is precisely why humanity will be just another of many dead end evolutionary cul-de-sacs in Earth’s natural history.

      I’ve come to peace with that, but this is a nice microcosm of the core reason. We can do better, we know better, but at the end of the day, almost all of us will just take the animalistic dopamine rush of winning.

      Live together or die alone. We choose the second one like breathing.

      If most humans were like Kempf (we’re not), we’d actually have a chance.

      • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think this hypothetical is about winning so much as never having to worry about your needs being met again. The calculus changes completely for a lot of people (not optimistic enough to say most) if that’s not part of the equation.

        • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Right, but at cost to others, and attempting to minimize the cost to others trying to rationalize it. That’s the point. Call it winning, call it succeeding, call it whatever you like, its me over us. The idea of accepting your benefit at the loss of numerous others tears people en masse down. Maybe another branch would become as popular, maybe not, but such choices are presented frequently in our civilization, and the choice is usually to take the win at other’s expense.

          Regardless, we are what we are and on a long enough time scale what we are will destroy us. That’s not as sad to me as all the other creatures we’ll take with us, but even we won’t be able to sterilize all terran life, so the Earth will recover from us. Life will go on after we successfully fuck ourselves trying to fuck one another. I find solace in that.

  • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seriously the best player. I’ve installed it on literally every personal computer I owned. I should make a donation.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    lol and people think Andrew “no chin” Tate is alpha. He is not even an epsilon next to this guy (or next to a person randomly drawn from the population for that matter)

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I paid $ as a donation for VLC. For the decades of use I’ve gotten out of it I felt I had to. Same for a couple other useful apps that have been free for a long time or very useful. I wasn’t able to afford much in years past, but now I can chip in. Hope this helps these devs keep the stuff free, nothing much worse than seeing a beloved FOSS close doors on users and demand fees.

    • doingless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t afford health care but I appreciate VLC and people who support it. All I can give is a God bless and thank you!

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I moved away from VLC because of the somewhat boring UI. Then I used potplayer, then I discovered MPV - which is awesome because it’s so performant you can easily customize it.

    But I think VLC helped pioneer the library that allows decoding and playing videos without the mess that were video codec drivers on desktop.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I try to play 3 random videos in VLC, they all three will play perfectly. If I try those same three on anything else, at least one of them will be buggy in some way.

      Yes you can argue there could be encoding problems in the video file of that buggy one, but somehow VLC just always works. Shit’s unbelievably good, so I won’t be switching.

      • DrMango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember the first time I encountered the Ogg Vorbis (.ogg) media type which ultimately lead me to downloading VLC as it was the only player that could handle it at the time

  • Komatik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why not take the money and make a new kind of vlc just a little different to comply

    • fin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While VLC has a larger community and thus they want to put ads on it, the author rejects to do that. That’s the point of this post.

    • i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re both free, you don’t have to choose and can have them both! Not everything needs to be compared and ranked.